Title: Justice in the Nuremberg Trials Forum
Course: BC - Genocide Studies 12 - 1.0 > Section: Unit 3: Escalation of the Holocaust

Instructions:

Answer the following forum question:  Did the results of the Nuremberg Trials lead to justice? Why or why not? Be sure to define justice as part of your response.

Your first post will be marked according to the forum marking criteria below. You then must respond to another student in your class by replying to their post. Your second post will also be marked according to the response marking criteria below.

Hints:

Here are some forum writing tips:

- Each main paragraph must have a topic sentence, relevant, specific details, and a clincher.

  - A topic sentence is a general statement that expresses the main idea of the paragraph.
  - The relevant and specific details are the examples that support the topic sentence. They should be specific statements that are interesting, relevant to the topic, and expressed clearly in grammatically-sound sentences.
  - A clincher is a general statement that concludes a paragraph. It usually restates the topic sentence of the paragraph in a creative way.

- When you respond to another student, make sure you are not just agreeing or disagreeing with them. Your response should be just as long as your main post and also build on what has already been said. You goal is to push the conversation and debate further by bringing to light new information.

Rubric

 | Not Completed | Emerging (Unsatisfactory) | Developing (Satisfactory) | Proficient (Very Good) | Extending (Excellent)
 | 0 | 4               5               6              7               8              9              10
Reasoning and Analysis | Not completed | Comments are off-topic or irrelevant. Thinking is confused or off-topic. Doesn’t make any reference to the lesson material. | Demonstrates awareness of the topic but little reflection on it. Comments are mostly relevant. Thinking is mostly clear and organized. Rarely references the lesson material. | Demonstrates consideration of the topic. Provides relevant comments. Thinking is clear and organized. Occasionally references the lesson material to support reasoning. | Demonstrates thoughtful considerations of the topic. Provides relevant and insightful comments. Makes new connections. Demonstrates exceptional logic and organization. Clearly references lesson material to support reasoning.
Responses | No responses were made or responses were inappropriate or rude. | Insufficient response to the topic, with mere agreement or disagreement, but no engagement in discussion. | Responses are minimally completed with a simple response to the original post. Few questions are asked and little further thinking is added. | Responses are thoughtful and engaged. May include a question or some good discussion starters. | Responses demonstrate thoughtful engagement with the original post. Thoughtful questions and excellent prompts for further discussion are included.
Total         /10 (Averaged between all posts)